This is an example with fictional data. A real report uses your team's own codes and the work type you choose. Every reviewer stays an anonymous code.
Competency report
Data annotation · 6 reviewers
Run completed in one week. Pass bar set at 75 out of 100.
6
Reviewers tested
3 of 6
Cleared the bar
2
Flagged for review
Your team, ranked
| Code | Score | Result | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| TR-014 | 88 | Passed | — |
| TR-009 | 81 | Passed | — |
| TR-022 | 76 | Passed | — |
| TR-005 | 63 | Needs review | — |
| TR-018 | 55 | Needs review | Left 3 items blank |
| TR-011 | 41 | Needs review | Finished suspiciously fast |
Inside one reviewer: TR-014
Every code opens into the same breakdown.
Overall
88
out of 100 · rank #1 of 6
Time spent34 minutes
Completeness100%
EngagementNormal
Competency breakdown
Accuracy91%
How often their answer matched the expert key
Problems caught84%
Share of the planted problems they flagged
Consistency88%
Whether they applied the rules the same way each time
Calibration79%
How well their confidence matched their accuracy
Efficiency72%
Time per item, relative to the rest of the team
Want one of these for your own team?
Run a free pilot this month. Leave your email and I'll reply personally to get started. No meeting, no contract.
Start a free pilot